Reports on Dagestan in the Arabic Historical Work: Tarikh ar-rusul wa al-muluk of at-Tabari

Authors

  • Magomed A. Gizbulaev 50A, pr. Nasrudinova, Makhachkala, 367000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.407

Abstract

This paper provides information on the 6th–8th centuries Dagestan history on the basis of translation, commentary and comparative analysis of excerpts from the Arabic historical work Tarikh ar-rusul wa al-muluk (History of the Prophets and Kings) of at-Tabari which contains data related to the history of the peoples of North Caucasus. In his multi-volume work Abu Ja’far at-Tabari (d.922) gives in detail a world history: describing events from the creation of world and covering through it the history of ancient civilizations known to Muslims. For the most part of the book at-Tabari relates the events in annual reports within the hijra space up to 302/915. The historical work of at-Tabari served as a source for the most of his successors who authored works on universal history in Muslim historiography. At-Tabari’s reports significantly add to his predecessors’ data on the relationships between the Caliphate and polities in the Eastern Caucasus, particularly, the important parts dedicated to Qabq (Caucasus), including al-Bab (Darband), from the time of its conquest (in 40s of the 7th century). Moreover, I compared reports on Dagestan from at-Tabari’s Tarikh ar-rusul and al-Balathuri’s Futuh albudan in order to find out whether the origin of the material is the same for both authors. As a result, only two passages were found that overlap. It should be noted that at-Tabari, in contrast to al-Balathuri, relates the story and events taken in Caliphate in chronological order without attempting to reconcile conflicting messages. The results of this research can further source study in writing the medieval history of Eastern Caucasus.

Keywords:

At-Tabari, al-Balathuri, medieval history of Dagestan, Tarikh ar-rusul wa al-muluk, Arabic historiography, source study, Caliphate, Caucasus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Murtazin M. F. Tabari and his work “Proceedings on the commentary of the verses from Quran. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no. 1, pp. 62–68. (In Russian)

Elton L. D. Ṭabari, Abu Jaʿfar Mohammad b. Jarir. Encyclopedia Iranica. Available at: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tabari-abu-jafar (accessed: 26.09.2018)

Kosegarten J. G. Taberis’anensis id est Abu Dschaferi Mohammed ben Dscherir Ettaberi Annales regum atque legatorum dei ex codice manuscripto Berolinensi arabice edidit et in latinum transtulit. Vol. 1–3. Greifswald: Fries, 1831–1853.

Annales quos scripsit Abu Djafar ibn Djarir at-Tabari cum aliis edidit M. J. de Goeje, ser. I, III. Leiden: Lugduni Batavorum, 1879–1901.

The History of al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk by Abu Ja’far Muhammad b Jarir al-Tabari. Vol. 1–40. New York, SUNI Press, 2007.

Belyaev V. I., Razumovskaya E. A. Reports from “Tarikh ar-rusul val-muluk” at-Tabari. Materialy po istorii turkmen i Turkmenii, vol. 1: 7th–15th vv. Arabskie i persidskie istochniki. Moscow; Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1939. 612 p. (In Russian)

Shmidt A. N. Ta’rikh ar-rusul val-muluk “History of prophets and kings”. Materials on the history of the Central Asia and Iran. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1958, 566 p. (Uchenye zapiski Instituta vostokovedeniya, vol. XVI). (In Russian)

Kubbel L. E., Matveeva V. V. At-Tabari. Ancient and medieval sources on ethnography and history of the Africa in South of Sahara, vol. 1: Arab source 7th–10th centuries’. Moscow; Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1960. 400 p. (In Russian)

Nadiradze L. I. Ta’rikh ar-rusul val-muluk, “History of prophets and kings”. Khrestomatiya po istorii Khalifata. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 1968. 252 p. (In Russian)

Shikhsaidov A. R. Translation of excerpts from the book by at-Tabari “History of prophets and kings”. Pamyatniki istorii i literatury Vostoka. Period feodalizma. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. 243 p. (In Russian)

Bolshakov O. G., Khalidov A. B. At-Tabari, Mukhammad. History of prophets and kings. Tashkent: Fan Publ., 1987. 440 p. (In Russian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010. Vol. II. 658 p. (In Arabian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010. Vol. IV. 577 p. (In Arabian)

Gumilev. L. N. The ancient Turks. St. Petersburg: Kristall Publ., 2003. 575 p. (In Russian)

Danlop D. The History of the Jewish Khazars. Available at: https://history.wikireading.ru/409297(accessed: 20.10.2018). (In Russian)

Gizbulaev M. A. Tarikh of Khaliph ibn Khayyat as a source for the history of Dagestan in 7th–8th century. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2016, no. 4, pp. 22–27. (In Russian)

Gizbulaev M. A. Arabic sources on the Medieval history of Dagestan. Voprosy Istorii, 2018, no. 7, pp. 130–137. (In Russian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010, vol. V. 627 p. (In Arabian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010, vol. VI. 622 p. (In Arabian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010, vol. VII. 657 p. (In Arabian)

Al-Tabari. Tarikh ar-rusul wa’l muluk. Beirut: Dar at-turas, 2010, vol. VIII. 669 p. (In Arabian)

Gizbulaev M. Reports by Arabic Authors Ibn Miskawayh and Al-Maqdisi on the History of Dagestan in the 8th–10th Centuries. Islamovedenie, 2018, no. 4, pp. 77–85. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2020-01-20

How to Cite

Gizbulaev, M. A. (2020). Reports on Dagestan in the Arabic Historical Work: Tarikh ar-rusul wa al-muluk of at-Tabari. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 11(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.407

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2019)

Section

History and source studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.