The History of the Andijan Branch of the Russian-Asian Commercial Bank

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.301

Abstract

The article deals with the fundamentals of the activity and functions of the Andizhan branch of the Russian-Asian commercial bank (1910–1917) in Turkestan general-governship. In Soviet historiography, banks were understood as an instrument of colonialism, both Western and Russian. The author, based on archival data, proves that the financial institutions of the Russian Empire took into account local specifics and encouraged the production of exportoriented products. The author actively uses interbank correspondence, annual reports of the branch director, as well as audit materials of the Andizhan branch. For the first time in historiography, active and passive operations of the bank were investigated, the expenses and profits of the bank were analyzed, and the bank’s staff was studied. The author, unlike Soviet and post-Soviet researchers, believes that banks have not become monopolies in the economy of Central Asia. The largest Russian bank in the region that had an extensive branch network (13 branches) throughout Central Asia was the Russian-Asian Commercial Bank (until 1910 the Russian-Chinese Bank). It should be noted that the Russian-Asian Bank was trying to take control of cotton production and industrial production. But in the end, the bank failed to become the locomotive of the region’s economic development. The main reason, according to the author, is the adaptation by the bank to the really existing economic relations in the Turkestan general-governorship and the khanates. The modernization of the Central Asian economy in the understanding of banks was to finance export crops and to mediate between the metropolis and the periphery. Colonial periphery at first glance seemed an attractive area
for investing and receiving superprofits, but the speculative nature of the Turkestan economy prevented the normal development of banks. As a result, the economic modernization of Central Asia slowed and opened the way for the Soviet experiment.

Keywords:

Andizhan, Ferghana, Russian Empire, Central Asia, Turkestan, Russian-Asian Bank, deposits, promissory note

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Aminov A. M. Economic development of Central Asia (colonial period). Tashkent, Gosizdat UzSSR Publ., 1959. 298 p. (In Russian)

Veksel’man M. I. Russian monopoly and foreign capital in Central Asia (late 19th — early 20th century).Tashkent, Fan Publ., 1987. 145 p. (In Russian)

Beliaev S. G. French capital and the formation of the Russian-Asian Bank. Otechestvennaja istorija. 1993, no. 5, pp. 165–173. (In Russian)

Beliaev S. G. Russian-French banking groups during the economic recovery of 1909–1914. St. Petersburg, En-Pi, 1995, pp. 87–93. (In Russian)

Bovykin V. I., Petrov Iu. A. Commercial banks of the Russian Empire. Moscow, Perspektiva Publ., 1994.350 p. (In Russian)

Gindin I. F. Banks and economic policy in Russia (XIX — early XX century). Izbrannoe. Ocherki istorii i tipologii russkikh bankov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997. 622 p. (In Russian)

Rodnov M. I. Economic ties of Ufa in the 1870s (based on the materials of the Volga-Kama Bank). Magistra Vitae: elektronnyi zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii, 2017, no. 2, pp. 17–23. Available at: http://magistravitaejournal.ru/images/2_2017/Rodnov.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2018). (In Russian)

Kastel’skaia Z. D. From the history of the Turkestan Territory (1865–1917). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 123 p. (In Russian)

Lavrent’ev V. A. Kapitalism in Turkestan. Moscow, Kommun. akad. Publ., 1930. 160 p. (In Russian)

Sadykov A. S. Economic ties of Khiva with Russia in the second half of the 19th — early 20th centuries. Tashkent, Nauka UzSSR Publ., 1965. 183 p. (TashGU, issue 296). (In Russian)

Khotamov N. B. The role of bank capital in the socio-economic development of Central Asia (early 90’s of the 19th century — 1917). Dushanbe, Donish Publ., 1990. 319 p. (In Russian)

Makhkamova N. R. Social structure of society on the territory of Uzbekistan: traditions and transformations (the end of the 19th century — 30th years of 20th century). Tashkent, Aloqachi Publ., 2009. 323 p. (In Russian)

Potapova N. Iu. The history of entrepreneurship in Turkestan (second half of the 19th — beginning of the 20th century). Tashkent, UMED Publ., 2011. 152 p. (In Russian)

Salomatina S. A., Frenkel’ O. I. Regional development of Russian joint-stock commercial banks in the second half of the XIX century: statistics and geoinformation technologies. Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatel’nyi zhurnal. Istoriia, 2016, vol. 7, no. 7 (51), pp. Available at: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001650-4–1 (accessed: 18.05.2018). (In Russian)

Iago K. Russian-Chinese Bank in 1896–1910: international financial intermediary in Russia and Asia. Ekonomicheskaia istoriia. Ezhegodnik. 2011/2012. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2012, pp. 293–314. (In Russian)

Crisp O. The Russo-Chinese Bank: An Episode in Franco-Russian Relation. The Slavonic and East European Review, 1974, vol. 52, pp. 197–212.

Quested R. The Russo-Chinese Bank a Multinational Financial Base of Tsarism in China. Birmingham, University of Birmingham, 1977, 225 р.

Konopka S. R. Turkestan region. Tashkent, Elektropechatnia pri Kants. Turkest. gen-gub., 1913. 603 p. (In Russian)

Report of the inspector B. Lukodyanov to the Bank’s General Inspectorate on the audit of the Andijan Branch on October 3, 1915. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 630. Op. 1. D. 239. (In Russian)

Correspondence of the Real Estate Department with the Andijan Branch of the Bank. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 630. Op. 1. D. 238. (In Russian)

Reports of the Andijan branch of the Russian-Asian Bank for 1911, 1912, 1914, 1915 and 1916. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 630. Op. 1. D. 237. (In Russian)

Published

2019-11-24

How to Cite

Alimjanov, B. A. (2019). The History of the Andijan Branch of the Russian-Asian Commercial Bank. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 11(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.301

Issue

Section

Russia and Asia