Syntax of Mass Media Language in the Context of Historical Development of Turkish Literary Language

Authors

  • Elena M. Napolnova Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Ksenia A. Verkhova Lomonosov Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.105

Abstract

In the history of Ottoman and modern Turkish literary languages, all the characteristic literary language features of pre-national and national periods respectively (processed, ordered,
selection of linguistic means, conscious regulation and codification, etc.) can be traced. The transition from the former to the latter at the beginning of the twentieth century occurred in
the form of a linguistic revolution, leading to fundamental changes at different language levels. This still active process is aimed at forming a language norm and creating means that meet the characteristics of individual functional areas of the literary language. Changes in vocabulary are more obvious, better studied and currently focused on creating new, Turkicbased lexemes to replace foreign borrowings. Syntactic changes, no less significant, aim to develop statement structure to facilitate adequate construction and understanding, while maintaining the features of the Turkic system, but these processes are not studied sufficiently. Active formation of the Turkish literary language takes place during a period of rapid development of the media — a functional sphere which occupies a special position due to its wide social base. According to several researchers, the current media language is considered representative of literary languages. This necessitates studying the trends in syntactic structure changes of the Turkish sentence, in order to trace general trends in the development of syntax diachronically, help create a general up-to-date picture of the syntax of the modern literary language, on the basis of a comparative analysis, to determine the main patterns in the development of Turkic syntax, and while teaching Turkish — to concentrate on students’ active acquisition of the most commonly used syntactic means.

Keywords:

Turkish literary language, mass media language, Turkic syntax

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Guhman M. M., Semeniuk N. N. Upon some principles of the study of literary languages and their history. Izvestiia Akademii nauk SSSR. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 1977, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 435–446. (In Russian)

Rusanovskii V. M. Upon the norm at different stages of the history of the literary language. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 1970, no. 4, pp. 54–68. (In Russian)

Social and functional stratification of literary languages. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 343 p. (In Russian)

Vinogradov V. V. Problems of literary languages and patterns of their emergence and evolution. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 134 p. (In Russian)

Solganik G. Ya. Introduction. Iazyk SMI i politika, ed. by G. Ya. Solganik. Moscow, Moscow University Press; Fakul’tet zhurnalistiki MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova Publ., 2012, pp. 12–20. (In Russian)

Galperin I. R. Essays on the stylistics of the English language. Moscow, Izd-vo literatury na inostrannykh iazykakh Publ., 1958. 459 p. (In Russian)

Media language as an object of interdisciplinary research, ed. by M. N. Volodina Moscow, Moscow University Press, 2003. 471 p. (In Russian)

Kazak M. Iu. Newspaper language: a textbook. Belgorod, Belgorod Publ., 2012. 118 p. (In Russian)

Evtiugina A. A. Functional stylistics: a textbook. Ekaterinburg, RGPPU Publ., 2018. 75 p. (In Russian)

Napolnova E. M. History of the Turkish literary language of the 13th–14th cent. Initial period: PhD abstract. Moscow, 1995. 27 p. (In Russian)

Özkan S. H. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Eğitim Dili ve Yabancı Dil Meselesi. Eğitime Bakış, 2017, no. 39, pp. 53–58.

Karal E. Z. Osmanlı Tarihinde Türk Dili Sorunu Tarih Açısından Bir Açıklama. Ankara, Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, 2017. 92 p.

Akalin S. H. New Developments in Turkish Lexicography: Electronic and Online Dictionaries of the Turkish Linguistic Society. Voprosy tiurkskoi filologii. Vol. ХIII. Moscow, MBA Publ., 2020, pp. 35–49. (In Russian)

Pistor-Hatam A. Osmanlı Devletinde Farsça Süreli Yayınlar (1876–1910). Kebikeç, 2003, no. 16, pp. 71–75.

Davison R. H. On dokuzuncu yüzyıl Osmanlı reformlarına araç olarak fransız dili. Available at: www.dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cttad/issue/25230/266684 (accessed: 07.02.2022).

Yavuzarslan P. Türk Sözlükçülük Geleneği Açısından Osmanlı Dönemi Sözlükleri ve Şemseddin Sâmî’nin Kâmûs-ı Türkî’si. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 2004, no. 44 (2), pp. 185–202.

Ekinci E. B. Osmanlı Devleti’nin Resmî Dili Var Mıydı? Available at: https://www.ekrembugraekinci. com/article/?ID=487&osmanli-devleti%E2%80%99nin-resm%C3%AE-dili-var-miydi- (accessed: 07.02.2022).

Dil Kurultayları. Atatürk Ansiklopedisi. Available at: https://ataturkansiklopedisi.gov.tr/bilgi/dil-kurultaylari (accessed: 10.04.2022).

Lewis B. The emergence of modern Turkey. London, New York, Oxford University Press, 1961. 568 p.

Lewis G. The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. New York, Oxford University Press, 1999. 203 p.

Türkçe Ezan 18 yıl devam etti. Timeturk. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120619012509/https://www.timeturk.com/tr/2012/06/16/turkce-ezan-18-yil-devam-etti.html (accessed: 10.04.2022).

Kornilov O. A. Linguistic view of the world as derivatives of national mentalities. Moscow, CheRo Publ., 2003. 349 p. (In Russian)

Türkçe, yeni bilim terimlerine kavuştu. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Boğaziçi’nde Bilim. Available at: https://bogazicindebilim.boun.edu.tr/node/23 (accessed: 07.02.2022).

Napolnova E. M. The verb dur- and other ways of expressing immobility in modern Turkish. Rossiiskaia tiurkologiia, 2017, no. 1–2 (16–17), pp. 86–99. (In Russian)

Napolnova E. M. Gerund -(y)iş and the evolution of the semantics of Turkish verbs. Voprosy tiurkskoj filologii. Vol. XII. Moscow, MBA Publ., 2018, pp. 79–94. (In Russian)

Ermolaeva S. Iu., Ikinci K. O. Cultural Transformation of the Turkish Information Space: Current Trends in the TV-Development. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniia, 2018, no. 5, pp. 217–233. (In Russian)

Masumova N. R., Jusupova E. E., Davydov S. A. Media and communications market in Turkey. Mezhdunarodnye kommunikatsii, 2020, no. 1–2 (14). Available at: https://intcom-mgimo.ru/2020/2020-14/turkey-mass-media-telecommunication-market (accessed: 18.03.2022). (In Russian)

Baibatyrova N. M. Modern press of Turkey: genre features in the context of Islamization and secularization of society: PhD abstract. St. Petersburg, 2010. 21 p. (In Russian)

Alekseeva O. A. On the Problem of Borrowed Words in the Turkish Media Language: Political, Ideological and Chronological Aspects (2000 and 2019–2020). Sovremennaia nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia “Gumanitarnye nauki”, 2021, no. 3/2, pp. 102–108. (In Russian)

Alekseeva O. A. Syntactic Features of Turkish News Materials. Litera, 2021, no. 10, pp. 44–60. (In Russian)

Polat H. Yabancılar için Kitle İletişim ve Basın Türkçesi (Arapça Açıklamalı ve Uygulamalı). İstanbul, Mevsimler Kitap Publ., 2018. 256 s.

Oganova E. A., Vorobieva S. N. Turkish: Textbook on Translating of Turkish-Russian Press. Moscow, Vostochnaia literatura Publ., 2012. 309 p. (In Russian)

Repenkova M. M. Turkish in Newspaper Discourse: Textbook on Translating Turkish and Russian Newspaper Texts. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2020. 207 p. (In Russian)

Sofronova L. V. Turkish language — I. Socio-Political Translation. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2019. 343 p. (In Russian)

Verkhova K. A. Causality in the language of the Turkish press: diachronic aspect. Programma i tezisy 29th Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Dmitrievskie chteniia”. Moscow, МBА Publ., 2021. P. 26. (In Russian)

Verkhova K. A. Grammatical meanings of opposition and concession in the language of the Turkish press. Mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia “36th Kononovskie chteniia”; tezisy dokladov. Available at: https://turkicstudies.ru/assets/uploads/2021/10/Tezisy_dokladov.zip (accessed: 17.03.2022). (In Russian)

Abumova O. D. Structural typology of Turkic cause-and-result constructions and their semantic realization in the Khakas language: PhD thesis. Novosibirsk, 2002. 198 p. (In Russian)

Shamina L. A. The System of Bipredicative Constructions with Infinite Verb Forms in the Turkic Languages of Southern Siberia: Dr. Sci. thesis. Novosibirsk, 2004. 334 c. (In Russian)

Published

2023-07-25

How to Cite

Napolnova, E. M., & Verkhova, K. A. (2023). Syntax of Mass Media Language in the Context of Historical Development of Turkish Literary Language. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 15(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.105