The Impact of Global Economic Integration on Africa in the 21st Century

Authors

  • Peter Adebayo University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240143, Nigeria
  • Justin Onyekpe University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, 100213, Nigeria
  • Abiodun Afolabi University of Ilorin, P. M. B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240143, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.207

Abstract

Has global economic integration in the 21 st century raised the hope of Africa beyond the traditional approach of providing aid to help her end poverty? Are there remarkable differences in the approaches of some regional economic blocs like BRICS, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and multilateral groups such as IMF, World Bank etc. towards Africa? What has been and should be the basis of bilateral or even, multilateral development relationships between these groups and Africa? To answer the questions, the study explores the philosophy behind the donor-recipient and equal partners’ approaches to development. It juxtaposes the depredatory effects of the socio-political and economic conditionality that the West has inflicted on Africa (ranging from integrated rural development in the 1970s, to policy reform in the 1980s, to governance in the 1990s, and respect for human rights in the 2000 (especially the gay rights movement and so on) and alternative models. The paper observes that the burden of foreign aid, loan agreement, economic and technical cooperation agreement, debt sustainability, etc. have deepened Africa’s vulnerability rather than brighten its prospects in a global market. By hinging its argument on the assumption that any global economic integration that imposes political and economic conditionality in exchange for aid is anti-development, this paper further submits that African countries should be free to negotiate their own pathway out of poverty as equal partners in development. Only by comparing and exchanging views, rather than tutorials, the more useful engagement between Africa and the rest of the world could become possible. It concludes that mutually–beneficial relations between Africa and economic cooperation blocs will become possible, but only if African governments can take hold of these opportunities in ways that will benefit their people. Africa governments should focus on win-win approach that is not about aid but business.

Keywords:

Africa, Integration, Economic Impact, Globalization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Kifle H., Olukoshi A., Wohlgemuth L. New partnership For African development: Issues and Parameters. Stockholm, Gotab, 1997.

Rowlands D. Partnership & Business Development Division: emerging donors in international development assistance: a synthesis report. 2008.

Hattori T. Reconceptualizing foreign aid. Review of International Political Economy, 2001, no. 8 (4).

Suwa-Eisenmann A., Verdier T. Aid and trade. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2007, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 481–507.

OECD Policy Dialogue On Aid For Trade, 3-4 November 2008. Binding Constraints Of Trade And The Role Of Aid For Trade. OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/site/tadpd/41577617.pdf (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Del Biondo K. Moving beyond a Donor-Recipient Relationship? Assessing Partnership in the Joint Africa-EU Strategy. Kolleg-Forschergruppe Working Paper Series, 2015, no. 63. 30 p. Available at: http://user-page.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/kfgwp/wpseries/WorkingPaperKFG_63.pdf (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Cosgrove Twitchett C. Europe and Africa: From Association to Partnership. Westmead, Franborough: Saxon House, 1978.

Crawford G. Partnership or Power? Deconstructing the ‘Partnership for Governance Reform’ in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 2003, no. 24 (1), pp. 139–159.

Carbone M. Rethinking ACP-EU Relations after Cotonou: Tensions, Contradictions, Prospects. Journal of International Development, 2013, no. 25, pp. 742–756.

Barcelona Declaration Adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference (1995). European Commission. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-95-7_en.htm (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Communication From The Commission to The Council And The European Parliament: Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Brussels, 2003. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Sobhan R. Globalization and the challenge to democracy. International Journal of Development Issues, 2003, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 1–14.

Trade-related Assistance: What Do Recent Evaluations Tell Us? Paris, OECD, 2006.

Global economic prospects and the developing countries: 1996. World Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/352361468762018027/pdf/multi0page.pdf (accessed: 15.12.2018).

World Trade Indicators. 2008. World Bank. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/wti2008 (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Panitchpakdi D. Why trade matters for improving food security. WTO News, 2015, April 13. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/news_E/spsp_e/spsp37_e.htm (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Berg A., Krueger A. O. Trade, growth, and poverty: a selective survey. IMF Working Paper. Washington, IMF, 2003, no. 03/30.

Global rebalancing: Effects on trade flows and employment. UNCTAD Discussion Paper. New York, United Nations, 2010, no. 200. 48 p.

Ouattara A. D. The Challenges of Globalization for Africa. International Monetary Fund, 1997, May 21. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/1997/052197.htm/ (accessed: 15.12.2018).

Downloads

Published

2019-06-25

How to Cite

Adebayo, P., Onyekpe, J., & Afolabi, A. (2019). The Impact of Global Economic Integration on Africa in the 21st Century. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 11(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.207

Issue

Section

Foreign policy and international relations of Asia and Africa