Buddhist scholasticism and modern speech-act theories

Authors

  • Вадим Борисович Касевич St. Petersburg State University, 7-9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

Scholasticism is usually thought of as a European tradition mostly associated with the Middle Ages. Yet, a very similar tradition is attested in Buddhism too. It is interesting to note that the Indo-Tibetan thinkers crucially anticipated some basic points of modern speech-act theory. At least implicitly, they use such an important category of modern semantics and pragmatics as presupposition. It is this category that helps adequately interpret the famous ‘noble silence’ of the Buddha when the latter was approached with metaphysical queries like that about whether this world is finite or not, etc.: any question like this presupposes existence of the world which is meaningless. The speech-act theory is also helpful in understanding the problem of ineffability. In Buddhism, language is not the ultimate vehicle of information. Even sacred texts cannot supply an adept with the ultimate truth. The meaning of a proposition is just a ‘raw material’ to be supplemented in many ways, including meditation, before the ultimate truth is attained. In the speech-act theory, too, they differentiate between different levels of the truth.

Keywords:

scholasticism, Buddhism, language, speech acts, ineffability, presupposition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Словарь средневековой культуры / под общ. ред. А. Я. Гуревича М.: РОССПЭН, 2007. 656 с.

Коплстон Ф. Ч. История средневековой философии. М.: Энигма, 1997. 512 с.

Гуревич А. Индивид и социум на средневековом Западе. СПб.: Александрия, 2009. 492 с.

Чанышев А. Н. Курс лекций по древней и средневековой философии. М.: Высшая школа, 1991. 512 с.

Cabezon J. I. Buddhism and language: A study of Indo-Tibetan scholasticism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994. xiv+299 p.

Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 17: Теория речевых актов. М.: Прогресс, 1986. 423 с.

Касевич В. Б. Буддизм. Картина мира. Язык. СПб.: Петербургское Востоковедение, 1996. 288 с.

Мудрецы Китая: Ян Чжу, Лецзы, Чжуанцзы. СПб.: Петербург-XXI век; Лань, 1994. 416 с.

Schilpp P. A. The philosophy of J. Dewey. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1938. xv+708 p.

Аристотель. Метафизика // Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4 т. Т. 1. М.: Мысль, 1976. 550 с.

Аверинцев С. С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы. М.: Наука, 1977. 318 с.

Витгенштейн Л. Философские работы. Ч. 1. М.: Гнозис, 1994. 612 с.

Щербатской Ф. И. Философское учение буддизма. Пг., 1919.

Гайденко П. П. Время. Длительность. Вечность. М.: Прогресс-традиция, 2007. 464 с.

Published

2013-09-22

How to Cite

Касевич, В. Б. (2013). Buddhist scholasticism and modern speech-act theories. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, (3), 13–18. Retrieved from https://aasjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2242

Issue

Section

Linguistics