Taboo Words as a Component of Invective Vocabulary and Their Determining in Arabic against the Background of Russian and English Languages

Authors

  • Victor V. Pallades St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2022.209

Abstract

The paper is devoted to understanding of the taboo phenomenon in language as a component of invective vocabulary on the example of Arabic, English and Russian languages, and also to study of the borders of this phenomenon and methods of its determination. In his study of conceptual features of forbidden words the author of the article refers to the works of K. Allen and K. Burridge, as well as M. Ljung. In addition to the theoretical works of linguists, the author analyzes the existing practice of implementing linguistic prohibitions in Russian, English, which affects such areas as legislation and media. Especially valuable material that was analyzed, was studies of English-speaking media regulators and major broadcasting companies. The main purpose of these surveys was to identify the list of words that audience considered unacceptable on the air, i.e. taboo. As for Arab law, there is no separation of vocabulary on permissible and unacceptable, as well as there is no obvious border and in Arabic language standards or usage. However, this does not mean the lack of prohibited words and the author clearly demonstrates the presence of taboos on examples from Arab media. In addition, the article discusses the works of Arab linguists M. A. Khatyab and N. Ya. Kanbar, dedicated to taboo vocabulary. Nevertheless, the problem of reliable determination and identification of language taboos has not been solved yet, and the author of the paper proposes a relevant criterion to determine the taboo words on the basis of the approaches existing in modern linguistics.

Keywords:

taboo, invective, Arabic language, English language, Russian language, taboo indicator

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Allen K., Burridge K. Forbidden words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 303 р.

Ljung M. Swearing. A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study. New York; Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 190 р.

Federal Law “On Amendments to Article 4 of the Law of the Russian Federation ‘On Media’ and Article 13.21 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses” of 05/04/2013 No. 34-FZ. Konsul’tantPl’us. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_144614/ (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Russian)

Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of December 30, 2001 No. 95-FZ (ed. dated 07/01/2021). Article 20.1. Disorderly conduct. Repository of the Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2002, no. 1 (part 1). Art. 1. (In Russian)

Recommendations for the application of the Federal Law of 05/04/2013 No. 34-FZ “On Amendments to Article 4 of the Law of the Russian Federation ‘On Media’ and Article 13.21 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses”. Roskomnadzor. Available at: https://16.rkn.gov.ru/directions/mass-communications/control-nadzor-smi/spravka/p15638/ (accessed: 10.08.2021).

There is a phenomenon, and the word is. Correspondence Dmitry Muratov with Roskomnadzor regarding the word “Mudilo”. Novaia gazeta. Available at: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/07/20/73184-yavlenie-est-i-slovo-est (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Attitudes to potentially offensive language and gestures on TV and radio Research report. Ofcom. [2016]. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/91624/OfcomOffensiveLanguage.pdf (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Obscene, Indecent and Profane Broadcasts. Federal Communications Commision. [2019]. Available at: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Acceptability Of Words In Broadcasting. Broadcasting Standards Authority. [2009]. Available at: https://www.bsa.govt.nz/oldsite/assets/Research/What-Not-to-Swear-Full-BSA2010.pdf (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Offensive Language. Channel 4. Available at: https://www.channel4.com/producers-handbook/ofcom-broadcasting-code/protecting-under-18s-and-harm-and-offence/offensive-language (accessed: 10.08.2021).

FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978). Justia US Supreme Court Center. Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/438/726/ (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Filthy Words By George Carlin. law2.umkc.edu. Available at: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/filthywords.html (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Levi L. The FCC’s Regulation of Indecency. First Reports. 2008, vol. 7, no. 1. Available at: https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FirstReport.Indecency.Levi_.final_.pdf (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964). Justia US Supreme Court Center. Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/378/184/ (accessed: 10.08.2021).

The ‘F Word’ Is No Longer Deemed Offensive In Australia. Lifehacker. Available at: https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2016/10/the-f-word-is-no-longer-deemed-offensive-in-australia/ (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Police v Butler (2003). NCW Caselaw. Available at: https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/549f-788d3004262463a8d568 (accessed: 10.08.2021).

How pop culture can (and should) change legal views on swearing. The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/how-pop-culture-can-and-should-change-legal-views-on-swearing-74539 (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Harm and Offence — Guidelines. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/editorialguidelines/guidelines/harm-and-offence/guidelines (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Guidance: Racist Language. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/editorialguidelines/guidance/racist-language (accessed: 10.08.2021).

Qānūn raqm 58 lis-sana 1937. Maḥkama an-naqḍ al-miṣriyya. [2020]. Available at: https://www.cc.gov.eg/legislation_single?id=404680 (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Ǧarāʾim al-ihana wa-alqaḏf wa-assabb. An-niyāba al-idāriyya. Available at: http://www.ap.gov.eg/elmaktaba/Crimes%20of%20insult%20and%20defamation%20and%20insult.pdf (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Qanūn al-ʿuqūbāt lidawla al-imārāt al-muttahida. Aṭ-ṭabʿa aṯ-ṯāliṯa. Dubai, Maʿahad dubai al-qa-ḍa’iyy, 2017. 155 p. (In Arabic)

Qanūn al-‘uqūbāt. Aṭ-ṭabʿa ar-rābiʿa. Al-Ǧazaʾīr, Maṭbūʿāt ad-diwān al-waṭani lil-išġāl at-tarbawiyya, 2005. 154 p. (In Arabic)

Šaraḥ ǧarīma as-sabb fil-qānūn al-ǧazāʾīriyy. Al-muʾassasa al-ǧazāʾīriyya lid-dirāsāt as-siyāsiyya wal-istratiǧiyya. Available at: https://www.politics-dz.com/ (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Qānūn al-ʿuqūbāt raqm 16 lis-sāna 1960 wa taʿdīlātah. Niqābat al-muḥāmīn al-urduniyyīn. Available at: https://www.jba.org.jo/CMS/UploadedFiles/Document/2f2aa013-f5c6–45df-b478–6427fe39ceea.pdf (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Šatā’im wa šatā’im bas. Raṣīf 22. Available at: https://raseef22.net/article/ شتائم،-وشتائم-بس-- 152779لماذا-يهين-المصريون-ر (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Ġaḍab min mašāhid muḫilla fi musalsal urduniyy li Netflix.. wa tadaḫḫul rasmiyy. Arabi21. Available at: https://arabi21.com/story/ غضب-من-مشاهد-مخلة-في-مسلسل-أردني-ل/ 1187598 -Netflix- وتدخل-رسمي (accessed: 10.08.2021). (In Arabic)

Al‐Khatib M. A. A sociolinguistic view of linguistic taboo in Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1995, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 443–457.

Qanbar N. Y. A Sociolinguistic Study of the Linguistic Taboos in the Yemeni Society. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2011, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 86–104.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-02

How to Cite

Pallades, V. V. (2022). Taboo Words as a Component of Invective Vocabulary and Their Determining in Arabic against the Background of Russian and English Languages. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 14(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2022.209

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Linguistics

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.