Traditionalism in the Oriental Dimension

Authors

  • Viktor V. Bocharov St Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.101

Abstract

The article analyzes the concept of “traditionalism”, identified by St. Petersburg scientists as a subject of oriental studies. The need to clarify the status of the discipline arose in connection with its reorientation in the early 2000s to the study of the modern East. If earlier sources for orientalists were written monuments on history, philosophy, law, etc., exported by pioneers and stored in the funds of Europe (London, Paris, Berlin, etc.), as well as St. Petersburg, now the object of research is the living cultures of the East. Ethnography and sociocultural anthropology (ethnology) are also involved in their study. These are related disciplines, however, if the former is more related to, description of the peoples exploring the specific manifestations of ethno-cultural phenomena: customs, rituals, beliefs, symbols, etc., then anthropology with comparative ethnology, the formulation of theoretical and methodological approaches for their study. “Tradition”, from the point of view of the author, since Antiquity has been closely correlated with politics and the aspirations of the elites. In the era of the Enlightenment, this concept acquired an ambivalent content: progressives treated it negatively, considering it an obstacle to the historical development of society, their opponents, on the contrary, believed that it was tradition that ensures the uniqueness of society in the process of its evolution. A similar attitude to tradition is retained in scientific discourse today, it is devoid of scientific content, but is an axiological category. The attitude to tradition is almost the main “bone of contention” in the modern confrontation between East and West. The author proposes an understanding of traditionalism that excludes the absolutization of both universalism (progressivism) and uniqueness in the understanding of tradition, which, from his point of view, corresponds to the principle of scientific character. Keywords: oriental studies, sociocultural anthropology, ethnography, tradition, traditionalism, methodology, the East.

Keywords:

oriental studies, sociocultural anthropology, ethnography, tradition, traditionalism, methodology, the East

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Bocharov V. V., Dyakov N. N., Gegamyan V. G. Socio-cultural anthropology of the peoples of Asia and Africa in oriental discourse. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2021, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 312–330. (In Russian)

Introduction to Oriental Studies. General course. Ed. by E. I. Zelenev, V. B. Kasevich. St. Petersburg, Karo Publ., 2011. 584 p. (In Russian)

Concepts of modern oriental studies. Ed. by E. I. Zelenev, V. B. Kasevich. St. Petersburg, Karo Publ., 2013. 464 p.

Klein L. S. History of anthropological teachings. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2014. 744 p. (In Russian)

Marx K. Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniia. Vol. 8. Moscow, Gos. izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1957, pp. 115–217. (In Russian)

Golovnev A. V. Ethnography in the Russian academic tradition. Etnografia, 2018, no. 1, pp. 6–39. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. Maxim Kovalevsky: anthropology of law and legal pluralism in Russia. ZhSSA, 2001, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 50–72. (In Russian)

Panchenko A. B. From populism to ethnology: the formation of D. A. Clementz as an ethnographer. Tri veka rossiiskoi etnografii: stranitsy istorii. Moscow, IAE RAN Publ., 2018, pp. 60–80. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. Unwritten law. Anthropology of law. St. Petersburg, RKhGA Publ., 2012. 386 p. (In Russian)

The majestic program of building communism and the tasks of ethnographers. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1959, no. 2, pp. 3–9. (In Russian)

Tolstov S. P., Zhdanko T. A. Ways of development and problems of Soviet ethnography. Voprosy istorii, 1964, no. 7, pp. 3–20. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. “Chechen war” as a social-age conflict. Antropologiia sotsial’nykh peremen. Ed. by E. B. Guchinova, G. A. Komarova. Moscow, Politicheskaia entsiklopediia, 2011, pp. 515–532. (In Russian)

Kal N. The truth about socialism in Kampuchea. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/7013720/ (accessed: 10.12.2021). (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. Intelligentsia and Violence (Anthropological Aspect). Antropologiia nasiliia. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001, pp. 39–88. (In Russian)

Rudnev V. A. Soviet customs and rituals. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ., 1974. 154 p. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. Power and time in the culture of society. Antropologiia vlasti. Khrestomatiia po politicheskoi antropologii, vol. 1. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2006, pp. 225–238. (In Russian)

Spencer G. Foundations of Sociology. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, I. I. Bilibin Publ., 1898. 412 p. (In Russian)

Neotraditionalism: “archaic syndrome” and the construction of a new sociality in the process of globalization. Ed. by V. V. Bocharov, V. A. Popov. St. Petersburg, IVR RAN Publ., 2019. 320 p. (In Russian)

Zammito J. H. Kant, Herder, and the birth of anthropology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002. 576 p.

Herder I. G. Ideas for the philosophy of the history of mankind. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 704 p. (In Russian)

Samylov O. V. The Formation of Historicism in the Philosophy of German Enlightenment (Johann Herder). St. Petersburg, SPbGUSE Publ., 2011. 159 p. (In Russian)

Chistov K. V. Tradition, “traditional society” and the problem of variation. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1981, no. 2, pp. 105–107. (In Russian)

Spengler O. Decline of Europe. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1993. 665 p. (In Russian)

Guénon R. Essays on tradition and metaphysics. Transl. from French by V. Yu. Bystrov. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000. 317 p. Available at: http://jezmmm.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/120951.pdf?ysclid=lh8psa5h1a151056030 (accessed: 04.05.2023). (In Russian)

Guénon R. East and West. Moscow, Belovod’e Publ., 2005. 234 p. Available at: https://royallib.com/book/genon_rene/vostok_i_zapad.html (accessed: 12.10.2021). (In Russian)

Averyanov V. V. Tradition and traditionalism in scientific and social thought in Russia (60–90s of the XX century). Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2000, no. 1, pp. 68–77. (In Russian)

Averyanov V. V. From the author. Tradition and dynamic conservatism. Moscow, Institut dinamicheskogo konservatizma Publ., Tsentral’nyi izdatel’skii dom Publ., 2012. 696 p. Available at: http://www.dynacon.ru/content/articles/578/ (accessed: 10.12.2021). (In Russian)

Surkov V. Yu. Russian political culture. A look from utopia. Lecture by Vladislav Surkov. Discussion materials in “Nezavisimaia Gazeta”. Moscow, Nezavisimaia Gazeta Publ., 2007, pp. 6–11. (In Russian).

Bocharov V. V. Power. Traditions. Government. An attempt at ethnohistorical analysis of contemporary political cultures of Tropical Africa. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992. 296 p. (In Russian)

Eisenstadt S. N. Tradition, Change, and Modernity. New York; Sydney; Toronto, John Wiley, 1973. 367 p.

Shils E. Center and Periphery. The Logic of Personal Klowledge. Essays Presented to Michael Polonai on his Seventieth Birthday. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961, pp. 117–130.

Kuper A. The invention of primitive society: Transformation of an illusion. London; New York, Routledge, 1988. 264 p.

Said E. Orientalism. London, 1977. 345 p.

Tishkov V. A. Society in an armed conflict (ethnography of the Chechen war). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001. 549 p. (In Russian)

Girenko N. M. Interaction of culture and society. Sotsiologiia plemeni. Stanovlenie sotsiologicheskoi teorii i osnovnye komponenty sotsial’noi dinamiki. St. Petersburg, Carrilon Publ., 2004, pp. 472–495. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. Colonialism: social and cultural processes. Antropologiia vlasti. Khrestomatiia po politicheskoi antropologii. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2007, pp. 67–85. (In Russian)

Bocharov V. V. “Revolution” in the socio-political development of the East. ZhSSA, 2012, vol. 15, no. 6. pp. 212–221. (In Russian)

Goffman A. B. Theories of tradition in the sociological tradition: from Montesquieu and Burke to Max Weber and Halbwachs. Traditsii i innovatsii v sovremennoi Rossii. Sotsiologicheskii analiz vzaimodeistviia i dinamiki. Ed. by A. B. Hoffman. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2008, pp. 69–127. (In Russian)

Goffman A. B. Traditional or Rational? Interpretation of tradition in the work of M. Weber. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2008, no. 4, pp. 120–129. (In Russian)

Girenko N. M. Dynamics of the biosocial system in the natural-historical process. Afrikanskii etnograficheskii sbornik, vol. XV. Leningrad, Nauka Publ.,1991, pp. 4–61. (In Russian)

Fortes M., Evans-Pritchard E. E. African Political Systems. London, [s. n.], 1940. 302 p.

Naumkin V. V. Modern convergent Arab nationalism in the mirror of historical memory. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2021, no. 6, pp. 42–59. (In Russian)

Published

2023-07-25

How to Cite

Bocharov, V. V. . (2023). Traditionalism in the Oriental Dimension. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 15(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.101