Механизмы сюжетообразования в первой книге японского литературного памятника «На своих двоих по тракту Тōкайдō» (яп. «То̄кайдо̄тю̄ хидзакуригэ», 1802–1809)

Анастасия Юрьевна Борькина

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu13.2018.104

Authors

Анастасия Юрьевна Борькина St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu13.2018.104

Abstract

The article presents the main characteristics of plot construction in the first part of “Tōkaidōchū hizakurige” by Jippensha Ikku, one of the most prominent works of the kokkeibon (“funny books”) genre. The following tendencies, continued to be used in the sequels, are highlighted in the article: the exploitation of techniques and plots of the travel literature of earlier epochs; the usage of three essential methods (ugachi, wordplay, situational comedy) in order to create comic scenes; the independence of episodes and the open final as the basis of the composition. The points listed above are illustrated with the fragments from “Tōkaidōchū hizakurige”, translated by the article’s author.

Keywords:

Jippensha Ikku, kokkeibon, gesaku, humorous fiction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Traganou J. The Tōkaidō Road: traveling and representation in Edo and Meiji Japan. New York; London: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. 267 p.

Kinsei bungaku kenkyū jiten [Энциклопедический словарь по литературе периода Кинсэй] / ed. Okamoto Masaru, Kira Sueo. Токио: Ōфӯся, 1986. 498 р.

Ishigami Satoshi. Jippensha Ikku-ni okeru Hizakurige-no isō [Измерение «Хидзакуригэ» в работах Дзиппэнся Икку] // Japanese Literature. 1992. Vol. 41. Р. 14–23.

Кин Д. Японская литература XVII–XIX столетий. М.: Наука, 1978. 432 с.

Jippensha Ikku. Tōkaidōchū hizakurige [На своих двоих по тракту Тōкайдō]. Токио: Иванами сётэн, 1958. 503 с. (Серия «Японская классическая литература», т. 62).

Григорьева Т. П. Японская художественная традиция. М.: Наука, 1979. 368 с.

Early Modern Japanese Literature: An Anthology, 1600–1900 / ed. Shirane Haruo. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002. 1027 p.

Shores M. W. Jippensha Ikku, Hizakurige and Comic Storytelling // Early Modern Japan: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 46–75.

Konita Seiji. Edo gesaku-no rensai kōsō [Идея публикации произведения по частям в литературе гэсаку] // Japanese Literature. 2004. Vol. 5. Р. 2–10.

Talamo M. Tōkaidōchū hizakurige: popular work or fruit of a well-planned commercial strategy? An inquiry from a sociological perspective // Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia. 2013. Vol. 26. P. 7–23.

References

Traganou J. The Tōkaidō Road: traveling and representation in Edo and Meiji Japan. New York, London, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. 267 p.

Okamoto Masaru, Kira Sueo, ed. Kinsei bungaku kenkyū jiten (The Dictionary of Kinsei literature). Tokyo, Ōfūsha, 1986. 498 p. (In Japanese)

Ishigami Satoshi. Jippensha Ikku-ni okeru Hizakurige-no isō (The phase of “Hizakurige” in Jippensha Ikku’s works), Japanese Literature, 1992, vol. 41, pp. 14–23. (In Japanese)

Кeene D. Iaponskaia literatura XVII–XIX stoletyi (Japanese Literature of XVII–XIX centuries). Moscow, Nauka, 1978. 432 p. (In Russian)

Jippensha Ikku. Tōkaidōchū hizakurige. Tokyo, Iwanami shoten, 1958. 503 p. (Japanese classic literature, vol. 62). (In Japanese)

Grygoryeva T. P. Iaponskaia khudozhestvennaia traditsiia (Japanese artistic tradition). Moscow, Nauka, 1979. 368 p. (In Russian)

Early Modern Japanese Literature: An Anthology, 1600–1900, ed. Shirane Haruo. New York, Columbia University Press, 2002. 1027 p.

Shores M. W. Jippensha Ikku, Hizakurige and Comic Storytelling. Early Modern Japan: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2012, vol. 20, pp. 46–75.

Konita Seiji. Edo gesaku-no rensai kōsō (An idea of serialization in gesaku literature). Japanese Literature, 2004, vol. 5, pp. 2–10. (In Japanese)

Talamo M. Tōkaidōchū hizakurige: popular work or fruit of a well-planned commercial strategy? An inquiry from a sociological perspective, Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia, 2013, vol. 26, pp. 7–23.